The principal goal of data science is to derive meaningful information from data. To do this, data scientists develop a space of analytic possibilities and from it reach their information goals by using their knowledge of the domain, the available data, the operations that can be performed on those data, the algorithms/models that are fed the data, and how all of these facets interweave. In this work, we take the first steps towards automating a key aspect of the data science pipeline: data analysis. We present an extensible taxonomy of data analytic operations that scopes across domains and data, as well as a method for codifying domain-specific knowledge that links this analytics taxonomy to actual data. We validate the functionality of our analytics taxonomy by implementing a system that leverages it, alongside domain labelings for 8 distinct domains, to automatically generate a space of answerable questions and associated analytic plans. In this way, we produce information spaces over data that enable complex analyses and search over this data and pave the way for fully automated data analysis.

When COVID-19 first started spreading and quarantine was implemented, the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM) Student Chapter at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities began a collaboration with Ecolab to use our skills as data scientists and mathematicians to extract useful insights from relevant data relating to the pandemic. This collaboration consisted of multiple groups working on different projects. In this write-up we focus on using clustering techniques to help us find groups of similar counties in the US and use that to help us understand the pandemic. Our team for this project consisted of University of Minnesota students Cora Brown, Sarah Milstein, Tianyi Sun, and Cooper Zhao, with help from Ecolab Data Scientist Jimmy Broomfield and University of Minnesota student Skye Ke. In the sections below we describe all of the work done for this project. In Section 2, we list the data we gathered, as well as the feature engineering we performed. In Section 3, we describe the metrics we used for evaluating our models. In Section 4, we explain the methods we used for interpreting the results of our various clustering approaches. In Section 5, we describe the different clustering methods we implemented. In Section 6, we present the results of our clustering techniques and provide relevant interpretation. Finally, in Section 7, we provide some concluding remarks comparing the different clustering methods.